Deadline


August 1999
Electronic Picture Archiving - Pleasure or Pain?

I recently rifled through my dusty pile of old copies of  Deadline and racked my
brain to attempt to remember the AUKML Conference Programmes (through the hazy
memories of some of the worst hangovers ever endured!)  and couldn't come up
with a single mention of the issues surrounding the archiving of images. 
Considering that the development of electronic picture archiving  has had as big
an impact on media libraries as that of electronic text archiving I find this
fact extraordinary.   I know for many of the larger media organisations the
function of  the picture library is totally separate from that of the
information unit but for many of us pictures are an integral part of what we do
every day.  So this short article is an attempt to redress the balance a little
by opening a dialogue on some of the issues surrounding picture archiving.

Background
In September 1996 here at The Scotsman Publications (TSPL)  we had our new
electronic archiving system installed.  After an initial training period the
system went live and we were quickly having to adjust to a whole new way of
working.
We currently archive all the published pictures for our three titles The
Scotsman, Scotland on Sunday and the Edinburgh Evening News. This includes all
agency and freelance images as well as those on which we hold the copyright.
This works out at around 1,000 published images a week.  In addition to this the
picture desk  for each title select unpublished images that they also want us to
archive.  This also works out at around 1,000 images a week but can be much more
depending on current events.  For example the current war in Yugoslavia and the
election for the Scottish Parliament have had a  massive impact on the amount of
unpublished images we are currently archiving.   We currently have well over
200,000 images stored in the archive.

Basic decisions
The main function for the archiver is to check the IPTC header for each image
and make the appropriate corrections and additions before archiving takes place. 
The basic decisions that must be made are:
Checking all spellings.
Make sure that the caption adequately describes the image.
Record publishing information - paper, edition, date and page number.
Check that the file type is the relevant one for the system e.g. ours is .jpg
Add additional keywords as and when necessary.
Assess copyright status of the image and add relevant payment information.
Sometimes you are working with well captioned images and the additional work
necessary takes only seconds before the image can be archived.  At other times
the caption may be very poor or even none existent and therefore the captioning
will take much longer.  At all times there is a compromise with what you would
like to do with the images and what you can do given the restraints of staff and
time.

Keywording
The main goal when archiving images is to correct errors and enhance the caption
information.   One way to enhance the information is through the addition of
relevant keywords.  There is a lot of discussion surrounding the use of
keywords,  from whether we should bother at all to more focused discussions on
the actual keywords to use.  Here at TSPL we use a controlled list of words that
are based on our old hard copy classification system. We simplified them and
adapted them for use with the electronic archive.  The system works well for us
most of the time.  We feel we are adding relevant information that greatly
improves the accuracy of searching. The controlled list we use is updated and
checked for errors about once every two months.

Workflow
With an electronic archive you are obviously limited by the amount of hardware
you have available.  At the moment we have two Apple Mac's that are used for
captioning and archiving and a third that can only be used for captioning. We
have a member of staff working virtually all day every day on the published
images for our two dailies and the Sunday edition takes a member of staff about
two full days to archive.
To make more efficient use of this hardware we have taken on extra staff at
evenings and weekends who deal specifically with unpublished images.  They can
caption and archive about 40 images an hour.

Staff who are used to dealing with photographs and have good computer skills can
be trained within a couple of weeks.  For staff with no background knowledge of
working with photographs the training process can be much longer probably taking
about a month with regular ongoing sessions.  The two main areas which need the
most amount of work while training are keywording and assessment of copyright
and payment.

Pleasure or pain?
So to return to my initial question - electronic picture archiving pleasure or
pain?
Obviously the biggest pleasure is that the end users now have direct access to
the archive from their own desktops.
The increased  flexibility that an electronic picture archive offers is beyond
question.  If an image is well captioned and keyworded it can be accurately
retrieved for use in many different situations within seconds.
We also love the end to mountains of  picture retrieving and filing!
On the down side:
We still don't receive 100% of all published images.  This is because our system
is not fully automatic and still relies on a person to physically "tag" an image
as published- inevitably they forget to do this.
Users of the electronic system often don't read the caption information.  With a
print the most natural thing in the world is to turn it over and check the
information on the back.  Scrolling through information on an electronic system
does not seem to come as naturally.  This has caused us many problems especially
in relation to copyright and payment.  We now have a limited access database
where "expensive/unusual" images are stored.  This database is controlled by the
library staff with users made fully aware of any conditions of use before they
are allowed to access the image.
Correcting mistakes - inevitably mistakes in the captions occur and they need to
be changed.  Our system does not cope too well with images being deleted as they
eventually corrupt the database and lengthy repairs have to be run.

Finally I would like to state something of which you are probably already aware. 
Picture Editors never forget!  This is the same for an electronic archive - that
one image that didn't get archived among the hundreds of  Monica, or Bill is the
exact one that they want and heaven help you if they can't find it!

Have you got anything to add to the debate? I would welcome your comments and
contributions - Are you using keywords? Are they plural or singular? Do you
archive agency pictures? How do you deal with picture selection? .... Let me
know via e-mail or post.  If I get a positive response I will summarise for the
AUKML list.  Those interested might also like to check out the following web
sites.
The VisualEdge '99 programme will appear at:
http://metalab.unc.edu/nppa/ve/  there is also a link to the '98 programme.
The SLA discussion site on keywords can be found at:
http://metalab.unc.edu/slanews/conferences/sla1998/photokeywords.html
An article on picture indexing by Stephanie Willen Brown appears on the SLA
website at:
http://metalab.unc.edu/slanews/archiving/VE98/presentation.htm
The Picture Agency Council of America also has some discussion and is at:
http://www.pacaoffice.org/

Fiona Boyd
fboyd@scotsman.com

 

Alexandra Erskine reports and highly successful AUKML visit to the Public
Records Office on 13 May.

The tour was adjudged a great success and we all thought that it was not long
enough.   We were welcomed by Anne Crawford, Press and Public Relations Officer,
who gave a half-hour introductory talk before the tour of the Office, which has
about 96 miles of documents and a growth rate of a mile a year.  This represents
only about 5% of the documentation generated by the government.  The building
dates from the seventies and is light and spacious, in attractive landscaped
grounds.

As the PRO has a website (www.pro.gov.uk) I will not go into too much
detail about its history.  It was founded by Act of Parliament in 1838 to
preserve the records of central government and courts of law and to make
them available to the public.  The earliest document is the Doomsday Book
of 1086 and there is an unbroken record from then to the present, subject
to the thirty year rule.  The collection includes the originals of Shakespeare's
will, Captain Bligh's account of the Mutiny on the Bounty and Edward VIII's
abdication instrument.

It is the national archive for the United Kingdom and for England and Wales
(Northern Ireland and Scotland have their own Records Offices for documents that
relate specifically to these legislatures)  However, many documents created
locally are stored locally; there is a network of city and county record
offices.  The PRO does not keep private collections.

Those of you who worked in the environs of Fleet Street may have visited
the Public Record Office's exhibition hall in Chancery Lane, now closed.
Resources problems meant that the proposed exhibition hall for Kew was
scrapped, but it is planned to have an Education and Visitors' Centre,
which will include a museum, for the Millennium.

The documents are arranged according to the archival principle of
provenance; all items are listed under the Department that created them.
The PRO is now capturing government e-mails, as they are public records,
to which the public is entitled to have access.  At present they are printed
for storage, but they will be stored electronically in future.  As with
media libraries, the PRO has been involved with electronic data for
several years.  The nineties have generated more recorded information per year
than ever before.  However, while the archival standard for books is 500
years, floppies last up to 20 years and optical disks perhaps 50 years, nobody
knows.

 An item can usually be located and made available in about half an hour
 from giving the PRO the document reference number.  There are about 450
 staff employed by the PRO, of which about 5 are librarians, 50 archivists
 and the rest are civil service intake trained on the job.  Provided that you
are at least 14 and have some ID you can use the PRO. There is no admission
charge.   They have about 450 seats and so far no queues.  The late opening
days,  Tuesdays and Thursdays are busiest and Saturday is the quietest.

For the future, there is space to last until 2010. By 2001 all searching
aids will be on their website.  All their detailed class lists should be
on their website by the end of June, 1999.  The guides will take longer.
The early "Calendars" - compilations of a précis containing all the key
information of each document which cover mediaeval and early modern
documents - will not be on-line.

Public Record Office, Ruskin Avenue, Kew, Surrey TW9  4DU.
Free tours take place on the second Friday of every month. For research it is
open Monday to Saturday 9am to 5pm (7pm Tuesdays and Thursdays).  Telephone:
0181 392 5200, Fax: 0181 878 8905, e-mail: enquiry@pro.gov.uk

They respond to enquiries by sending leaflets or giving you a list of
independent researchers that you use at your own risk.
Fiona Tennyson, a member of AUKML Committee, looks at the possibility of forging
a closer link between AUKML and the Library Association.  Initially fearful of
being taken over,  she now thinks that the offer of observer status on the
Special Libraries Group could be beneficial.

 What's going on at the Library Association?  First the AUKML committee is
approached by Mark Fisher, the LA Special Libraries Group representative, asking
if we are interested in developing links with the LA. Then word gets out that
the LA and IIS (Institute of Information Scientists) are talking seriously about
unifying.  Is the Library Association trying to take over the information world
and are they aiming to make AUKML another notch on their bedpost?  
According to Fisher the aim is to construct a 'network of networks', to provide
a forum for those working in special libraries to share those aspects of their
work which may be relevant beyond the confines of their particular industry and,
as Fisher said, 'to prevent us all reinventing the wheel'.  There are three
levels of affiliation on offer.  First and most extreme, full membership of the
Library Association – Fisher appeared to assume that we would dismiss this out
of hand. The second option would be to become  'an organisation in liaison' .
This would mean AUKML having formal links with the LA, but stopping short of
being a constituent member. The third option was to have a place as an observer
at the committee meetings of the Special Libraries Group. The AUKML
representative would be able to contribute to the discussions but obviously
wouldn't be able to vote on decisions. 

Traditionally AUKML has been wary of any links with the LA. We've seen ourselves
as independent and non-aligned, and have jealously guarded against any attempt
to compromise this stance. I suppose an underlying fear is of being subsumed and
losing our identity within a larger organisation. One of the strengths of AUKML
is that we are independent:  we don't have to toe any party line. 

An obvious point but one worth making is that being a member of AUKML doesn't
preclude membership of other groups.  So why is it necessary to formally
affiliate ourselves with an organisation of which many of us are already
members?  Writing as a lapsed member of the LA I feel I need to declare my
prejudices.  I'm not sure that what the membership gets from the LA is enough to
justify the large subscription fee and know that I'm not the only person to feel
this way. However, there may well be members of AUKML who feel the same way
about this organisation!   

AUKML was founded through a mixture of idealism and pragmatism in order to
provide a forum for media librarians to meet and discuss common experiences and
problems; to facilitate the exchange of information and ideas and enable us to
keep up with developments in our industry. The ideal which propelled the
organisation was the belief that although we work in differing structures, the
things we have in common are more important that the things which separate us
and that we can learn from one another. The pragmatism is that when one needs 
the inevitable favour, other librarians working in the media will be more likely
to say yes, if they've met through AUKML. 

When links with the LA were originally proposed I was instinctively opposed. I
felt that AUKML was doing fine and couldn't really see what we had to gain from
links with any other organisations – after all, what could organisations not
involved with the media teach us? At the AUKML conference in Brighton last year 
Margaret Wallace spoke about marketing your service. One of the statistics she
mentioned was that the overwhelming majority of public librarians felt marketing
would be of no benefit because public libraries didn't have any competitors.  I
began to feel very uneasy  because I recognised I shared the same lager
mentality.  

My feeling now is that this is an opportunity the organisation should grasp. If
we take up the offer of a place as an observer at the SLG meetings we don't
compromise our independence but gain the opportunity to find out what's
happening in other sectors of the industry, to make new contacts and to raise
the profile of AUKML .  I was involved in organising the conference this year
and learned a lot from the experience. The conference doesn't happen if there
aren't any sponsors and it is boring for delegates without good speakers.
Getting good speakers and sponsors depends on contacts. Any opportunity which
gives AUKML the chance to increase contacts, should be taken.  An informal link
with the LA will increase out potential contacts.  
The committee felt that this was a decision they shouldn't take without opening
it to the membership.

What do you think?    Send your letters to the Editor or  email Fiona or, best
of all, share your views by posting them to the AUKML discussion list:
aukml@brighton.ac.uk
Richard Nelson of the Guardian & Observer Research and Information Department
is not one to turn down the chance of free drink.  So, on a June evening he took
himself to Clerkenwell to sample the drink and wisdom to be found at the
Institute of Information Scientists' Free Pint lecture.


It was an invitation that was hard to refuse - the man from Free Pint offering
to buy everyone a free pint.  William Hann, Managing Editor of the email
newsletter Free Pint, in a bid to get people to come and hear him speak, had
promised drinks all round.

Around 40 people took Hann up on the offer at one of the Institute of
Information Scientists' (IIS) regular meetings. Perhaps not surprisingly in a
room full of IIS members, a show of hands indicated that most already used the
service. For those who hadn't, Hann explained that Free Pint is a free
fortnightly newsletter about the Internet written by information professionals.
As well as practical searching advice it includes subject-specific articles.
These have ranged from Environmental Information, Understanding Cookies to
Coffee Resources on the Web.  Since being launched in November 1997 it now has
over 23,000 subscribers.

The actual Free Pint idea came to Hann while he was having a drink on London's
South Bank. This inspirational moment though came after a lengthy period of
research and preparation and his advice to anyone planning to embark on a
similar project is do your homework first.

The key to any website's success he revealed was that while it was free, it
should still be a valuable product that users want to return to. To achieve this
you should at the very least know who your audience is.  For example, Hann knew
that there are  approximately 30% Free Pint subscribers in the UK,  30% in the
US
with the rest scattered around 120 countries.  From a simple occupation
question,
(with a 90% reply success rate), he knew exactly the types of knowledge workers
who use the service.

Promotion had come from word of mouth rather than press adverts.  Hann's advice
was to get people passionate and talking about your site so as to build up a
community.  This then leads to cross-promotion with other sites and the
generating of feedback . It is also useful to check the log-file so as to find
out what browsers people are using to look at your site as well seeing how many
pages they view.

Judging from the questions asked, it was how the whole thing supports itself
that people were interested in.  After all a great resource like this could
hardly be run for altruistic reasons alone?  Well for a start, Hann explained,
authors write for free (a common feature to many  information related
publications).  In the beginning it was supported by Willco, his Internet
company,
but now with four adverts per edition, it's self-supporting and he can afford to
employ someone to help run it.

Surely though there must be some sort of grand plan behind Free Pint beyond that
of improving Internet search techniques?  When asked about what he proposes to
do
in the future with such a valuable collection of  the email addresses, the
normally ebullient Hann was momentarily stuck for words. With the skill worthy
of a seasoned politician though, he replied that it wouldn't be worth his
reputation in the information business world if he were to sell it and he had no
plans to do so. Developments in the immediate future included The Bar, the
appropriately named chat room and the Internet Guide, a Yahoo-like search
engine.

To the average searcher, such questions about the future are probably
irrelevant.  Free Pint is a truly valuable source of information especially the
entire archive going back to 1997 can be searched from the website.

Free Pint: www.freepint.co.uk
Institute of Information Scientists: www.iis.org.uk

A week before the first AUKML meeting in the north of England Jan Holliday
through she was in for a lonely time.    But in the end six souls headed for
Huddersfield for an interesting and thought-provoking evening.

The first ever northern meeting of the AUKML was in jeopardy of being cancelled.
Nine days  prior to the event we had only one delegate, Jane from the Northern
Echo.  I thought it might be better to call her and suggest we forget it. Then I
got a call from David at the Yorkshire Post to say he would be coming.  -Great, 
I thought -we'll move the venue to the pub. . A couple of days later Brian from
the Liverpool Echo rang to say he would be coming.   That made THREE - wow!

Indranee de Silva rang to ask how things were going and I told her.  So, bless
her, she got on the phone and managed to round up three more from the York
Evening Press, the entire library staff in fact.  This made six and at the end
of the day these were all the northern AUKML members that came.  Do you gather
from the previous comment that we had a thoroughly good time? We did!

We decided to keep the meeting informal and although an agenda was prepared we
didn't  follow it closely.  We began with a tour of the Examiner starting with
the Library itself, which is not large, then the Archive Room and through the
News Room.  I think everyone was envious of our pleasant working conditions.  We
are situated at the top of the building, with plenty of light through skylight
windows, and air conditioning that works (well most of the time anyway).

After the tour we discussed various topics and common problems pertaining to
newspaper libraries.  For example, how we keep tabs on photographs.  Has anyone
a foolproof method - if so please let the rest of us know.   We all use
different systems for archiving, the Examiner being the only non electronic
library present at this meeting.  How we are all continually fighting to keep
standing still, trying to keep up the levels of finance and maintaining a good
service.

The end result of the meeting was that we all felt we had gained something by
talking to one another and that it was very useful to see how different
newspaper libraries tackle the same problems and difficulties.  The main message
was that in most of our difficulties WE ARE NOT ALONE.

We were so busy discussing everything that we forgot to arrange another meeting.  
We did talk about it briefly as everyone was leaving and the consensus of
opinion was that we must carry on now that we have started to meet.   David from
the Post has offered the Yorkshire Post as the next meeting venue - time and date
to be fixed.

I did think that Huddersfield was pretty central but maybe the lack of interest
means that we need to pick somewhere else that is easy to get to and Leeds I
think fits the bill fairly well.  I think that these meeting should continue. 
If more people attend it should lead to better solutions to our common
difficulties.  I realise that each library is different and needs to use
different methods but I firmly believe that if we communicate with one another
we may be able to pick up new ideas and solutions to enable us to move forward.

It would help the committee of AUKML to know why more people did not attend this
inaugural meeting.  Was it cost, time, venue or agenda?  If you let them know
(see back page for contact details) we can adjust the next meeting which we hope
will be in the autumn.
Elaine Dawson, Ian Bucknell and Nicola Cowen, all trainees with the Guardian
Research and Information Unit, found the AUKML Graduate Trainee Open Day a
nourishing experience, for the brain and the stomach!

The 1999 AUKML Graduate Trainee Open Day did not begin well for the delegates
from the Guardian.  The mirrored hallways confused us and for a while we were
unable to find the lift.  Luckily, these proved to be minor obstacles.

We were looking for reassurance, from the event, that we had made the right
decision to pursue a career in this field.  Worries about the increase in course
fees, reduction in bursaries and uncertain prospects had dominated our thoughts. 
Would our fears be allayed?  Would it be interesting?  Would there be any decent
food for lunch?

The first speaker was David Nicholas from City University.  He offered advice on
how to choose a library school, taking into account the reputation of the
institute, final destinations of previous students and course content.  For
example, a university like City concentrates mostly on new technology whereas
some courses also offer more traditional elements such as cataloguing. 
Therefore, course decisions should take into consideration career aims.  
Moreover, he gave an insight into the attributes he would look for in a
potential student.  Communication skills, enthusiasm and self-confidence were
all emphasised.  While we thought that his advice was sound, it was slightly too
late since most of us had not only chosen courses but had actually accepted a
place.  It would have been more beneficial to have heard this speech before
Christmas while in the process of making these decisions.

You could almost smell our trepidation as Ophelie O'Hanlon was introduced as a
representative of Lexis-Nexis, whose overwhelming software we were all too
familiar with.  But on an emotional roller coaster of a day, we could barely
suppress our delight when we were introduced to the web version of their wares. 
As Ophelie demonstrated, this user-friendly package would be an asset to any
media information library, providing a wealth of sources from which to search. 
(NB the promise of 10% commission from any new subscribers has in no way
influenced this article)

Professor Charles Oppenheim of Loughborough University addressed the prospects
for the information scientist.  He discussed the issues of navigation, security
and quality of information on the internet as well as the expanding role of
intranets and push technology.  He believes that advances in technology will
change rather than endanger the profession, leading to the information
specialist as a trainer and evaluator.  (As he said, end-users are lazy) 
Although the content was thought-provoking, his speech was most memorable for
his numerous anecdotes and extravagant tie.  But there was no tie in the
popularity stakes, Charles was a clear winner.
The contrasting experiences of the three speakers who described 'a day in the
life' of a media library gave further evidence of the breadth of possibilities
the profession offers.
Jill Tulip from Time Out who heads a department of two - housed in what used to
be a broom cupboard- says she loves the intimacy with the journalists that a
small library offers.  She is Jill, not just a librarian, not just a voice at
the end of a telephone line, but Jill.  And for that we grew to love her.
Representing the BBC was Panorama's Annabel Colley who told of her ascent 'from
gopher to guru' status.  From humble beginnings, her role has evolved to
incorporate primary source research, net training and seminar presentations. 
Though it is possible to remain with Auntie's celebrated archives, her story
indicates that a larger organisation proffers multiple career paths.
The News International Centre is relied upon by four national newspapers with
diverse needs.  John Turnbull explained that he may be digging up the historical
context of a political crisis one minute and asked for the latest celebrity
gossip the next.  Apparently, some tasks are more gratifying than others.
All three of these speakers had carved very different niches for themselves. 
The lesson of the day was that information science can be, within reason,
whatever you want it to be.  Vive la difference!

Finally, Lucy Wingar from TFPL consultants gave a positive account of employment
opportunities in all areas of information science.  (Despite having her visual
aids destroyed by a thunderstorm on her way to the conference)  Although they
deal less frequently with media organisations, who tend to recruit directly, the
agency can still provide help with CVs and interview technique.

Our thanks must go to Amanda Watson from News International for organising and
chairing the conference.  Thanks also to the speakers for sharing their
knowledge, experience and enthusiasm.
As far as the food was concerned, it exceeded all our expectations.  We were
presented with a dazzling array of sandwiches (not a soggy one in sight), little
sausages on sticks, cakes and fruit.  This feast was much appreciated.

We left the Open Day in high spirits, with our fears far behind us and our
pockets full of leftovers.

TRANSPORTS OF DELIGHT.

Over the years I have clocked up a fair mileage travelling to London from North
West Kent.

Rail travel from this neck of the suburbs has always been notoriously bad.  My
local train the 8.14 from Barnehurst to Blackfriars became legendary for it's
lateness and cancellations.  To the extent that after all the radio
announcements informing travellers that the 8.14 was yet again cancelled a
record was made to the tune of Day Trip to Bangor called The 8.14 from
Barnehurst to Blackfriars.

In my Fleet Street days we had to work nights and did not finish until 4am. 
This is fine if you have a car.  If however you are not so fortunate then you
have problems as the last train leaves at 11.30 pm.

One Saturday afternoon I jumped into the old jam jar to begin my shift at 5pm. -
You have guessed it, Genevieve did not want to go to London. Trying every trick
I knew to coax the old girl  into life I eventually resorted to John Cleese type
actions. I kicked it. Swore at it. Threatened it with the knackers yard.  All to
no effect.

In desperation I searched for an alternative means of transport.  Eventually I
found a rusty old push bike belonging to my sister which had not seen the light
of day since Queen Victoria's coronation (The bike not my sister)

After mending a dozen punctures I managed to stir the machine into some form of
life.

The plan was simple. For the outward journey  I would put the bike on the train.
For the return trip I would cycle the sixteen miles.

After getting the bike off the train at Charing Cross and cycling the short
journey to Fleet Street I could now see what a daunting task the return journey
would be.  Man and machine were not in perfect harmony.

4 am Sunday morning eventually arrived and I wheeled the contraption on to the
street. The day started as a perfect summers morning with the dawn breaking.
 My adventure was about to begin.

On reaching Blackfriars Bridge the first rain drop the size of a dinner plate
hit me.  Then the sky lit up as snake tongued lightening cracked the dawn sky. (
This is good stuff Ed. You could pay good money for this)  Within seconds the
road had become a river.  There was no point in sheltering as it was impossible
for me to get any wetter. I put my head down and pedalled harder. Then - PING. 
Looking down in horror at the noise coming from somewhere near the back wheel I
discovered the cable which operated the Sturmy Archer gears had snapped (Who
remembers them?)  and was trawling along in the river behind me.

I assessed my current situation.  It was 4.10 in the morning and I was fifteen
miles from home in a thunder storm on a push bike stuck in top gear.  The speed
of my pedalling was like a slow motion film.  My legs resembled Heathcliffe
running across the moor to meet Kathy.

As I struggled on I drew a mental picture of my journey ahead and of Blackheath
Hill  and Shooters Hill.  These had now taken on the proportions of Everest and
K2.  I kept thinking of other alternatives and decided on a different tack.

All my previous journeys by road however had been by car, and the thing about
driving a car is that you do not appreciate distances and inclines in the same
way as when you are struggling along on a clapped out push bike stuck in top
gear. (Dunno though - You should see some of the cars I've driven.)

I managed to avoid Shooters Hill and Blackheath Hill by travelling on the A2. 
Only thing was I had now increased my journey by another five or six miles.

Man and machine eventually reached their destination just as the rain stopped
and the sun was high in the sky.

Strange as it may seem this experience did not put me off - A reflection on how
bad British Rail was.  I reasoned that if I had a decent bike it would be a
great way to commute and I would be quads in.

Passing the local bike shop I first saw her.  The dream machine. In the window
before me stood a metallic powder blue racing bike. Reynolds tubing. Umpteen
gears. Wheels the width of razor blades and shod with tub tyres.  For those of
you who don't know, tubs are tubular tyres which do not have inner tubes.  In
the event of a puncture you just remove the quick release rimless wheel and roll
on the new tyre.

The deal was made and we were united.  Of course I had to have all the right
apparel to go with my new love.

The first day saw me cycling like crazy. Dressed to kill in my lycra shorts and
top Chris Boardman would have been proud of me. (If I wore that gear now I would
look like a burst tea bag.)  Head down and pumping my legs furiously. I then
heard "Good morning" in my right ear.  A man twice my age on an upright bicycle, 
pin striped suit and cycle clips slipped effortlessly passed me. Horrified I
started selecting various gears in an effort to catch him.  I was hopelessly
outclassed.  My ego had taken a mortal blow.

On the third day I heard a crack from beneath me.  Looking down I discovered my
rear tub tyre was like spaghetti.  No worries.  Within minutes the wheel was
removed and a new tyre rolled on.

On the fourth day the suede saddle disintegrated and had to be substituted for a
common plastic version.

The following day saw me performing the most amazing gymnastic feat as the
straps holding the saddle bags came loose and jammed in the spokes. I left the
saddle and  cartwheeled over the handlebars.

Monday the following week saw my second puncture.  This was followed by another
on the Thursday and again on Friday.  The local bike shop was making a fortune
and would soon be able to buy a bigger shop on the proceeds of tub tyres.  I
soon realised that tub tyres were great for the race track but useless for
commuting to London.  The rimless wheels had to go and be replaced by
conventional wheels and tyres.  My bike was now just an ordinary bike and
costing me a fortune.

I was no longer in love.

How else could I get to work?  Hoop and stick might be worth a try.

Apologies if I caused offence in my last article in which I mentioned Ronald
Bedford.  On reflection I realise this was in bad taste.

O.K so Charlton Athletic are relegated.  After winding up orders. Ground
sharing. Standing in local elections as The Valley Party in order to get
Greenwich Council to allow us home.  Fans having to raise nearly two million
pounds. - Relegation is a mere trifle.
Anyway I had trouble reading the team sheets in the Premier Division. - Am I  
xenophobic?

My advice is transfer allegiance to the Faroe Isles - great team (- Ed)

 

 

 

Michael Brunton at Time Magazine      MAY 1999

Monday.

Cycle to work? Brettenham House at Waterloo Bridge.  The place is a mess, clips, folders,newspapers and books litter the reference desk that sits in the centre of Time Magazines' library in London. Gone thankfully are the Cheesy Wotsits bags, Hobnob crumbs and other incriminating evidence of unhealthy Friday night cravings.   Friday is our deadline, and this wasw a bad one with late-night breaking stories that kept the two late-shifters there till 2 in the morning. There have been better closes and worse ones, but ever since TIME began publishing its Atlantic edition out of London, our junk snack intake has rocketed. And every Monday, towering proud of the debris are the papers for Saturday, Sunday and Monday. Resolve yet again to tackle the question: do we really need to clip any more? Tidy up and dig in.

Tuesday.
Cycle to work. Mark some papers, answer mail and email, catch up on some news so I can nod sagely at the 11am story conference. This is the week's first gathering of editors, writers, reporters, researchers, plus the pix, art and production departments, where we decide what's going into this week's issue: who's writing, who's reporting, who's researching and what the cover options are. (This list is honed and refined as the week goes on, then typically thrown out of the window by events or by editor's whim on Friday.) Mayhem it may be, but it's terribly important, I think, for the library to be involved in every aspect of the mayhem. 

2pm. Cycle home? my afternoon for picking up daughters from school.

Wednesday.
The eye of the storm. While TIME's correspondents around the globe are busy writing and interviewing to meet their Thursday deadline, we wait breathlessly. A good day for updating the library's intranet pages that form the core of our key objective? to reshape and revitalise the company through the implementation of information management strategies and technologies that will collate, channel and disseminate mission critical information into the darkest corners of the company. (Note: must find out what Knowledge Management is. Is it even cooler than Information Management? Does  it pay better?)

The library pages dribbled into existence almost a year ago but it was only after the company's assorted netheads got together to form an intranet project team that they began to acquire a measure of legitimacy. Then the Man from Del Monte (aka the Publisher) said 'yes' and lo! we now have a full-time intranet co-ordinator (aka Robert).Thanks to Robert we no longer have to make do with my primitive grasp of HTML, for while we may not understand Robert, Robert understands scripting in many tongues and can make our pages do wondrous things.

Thursday.
Writers' first drafts of stories are beginning to accumulate in the system and the researchers assigned to each one can begin the TIME-honoured process of checking and rechecking. (the terms 'red check' ,'black check' and 'greening' have their origin in the different coloured pencils used to make TIME stories fit to print.) And whatever damage the television age has inflicted upon news magazines, TIME still cherishes and relies upon its reputation for accuracy. This in spite of the erosion over the years of the laborious interplay between top editor, senior editor, writer, correspondent, reporter and researcher that earned that reputation (and not a little ridicule).

Gone too, in London at least, is the distinction between librarian and researcher: fellow librarians Kate Noble and Mairi Ben Brahim both steer stories through the checking process, trimming stories to fit and adding headlines, subheds and captions. Each week they also have responsibility for assembling statistics for the 'Numbers' section, writing copy to accompany the Image of the week and putting dots in just the right place on the World Watch map. The buzzword in media libraries these days is of 'computer-assisted reporting'. We prefer to think in terms of 'library-assisted reporting'.

Friday.
Printing presses around the world stand ready to roll off TIME through Saturday and delays can be hideously expensive. That's why Friday is a tightrope walk between updating or late-starting stories and putting them to bed. We huff and moan about it of course, but as any news junkie will tell you, there's no denying the buzz of a deadline. Call home to say goodnight to the children. My 6 year-old wants to come to the office during half-term. Katherine's been here a few times and has decided she wants my job when she grows up. Why? "Because you do cutting-out and sticking and stamping, and you write stories and play on a computer." She's right of course but she can't have it, because it's mine!   by Michael Brunton Information Manager Time Magazine



Charles Oppenheim's comments:  Jonathan Leigh-Hunt's article, whilst correct in most regards, is misleading in two places.  In particular, the statement that "Under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 multiple copying of literary and text works is not permitted unless permission is obtained from each individual copyright holder" is untrue.  It is a defence to make copies under fair dealing (and this can include multiple copies) for the purposes of research, private study, criticism, review or reporting current events.

Whilst each case would be considered on its merits, the more copies that are made the less likely it is that that fair dealing applies.  But the presence of book reviews which appear in newspapers and which include reproduction of some original texts shows that making millions of copies of some texts is possible under fair dealing.  The statement that CLA helps lobby "on behalf of rightsholders and users" is also misleading, as its primary focus is to support rightsholders, and not users.


I am a supporter of CLA and I warmly welcome its work in developing a licence for electronic copying.  However, there is  no need for it to mislead users to promote its work. Professor Charles Oppenheim Dept of Information Science Loughborough University Loughborough Leics. LE11 3TU Tel 01509-223065 Fax 01509-223053

As practising librarians and highly qualified information specialists,  AUKML members should be more aware than most of copyright law, and the Copyright Licensing Agency's (CLA) role as a licence provider.  The trial of persuading senior management to take copyright issues seriously probably strikes a familiar cord with many AUKML members, as does the possibility of being held personally liable for breaking the law. Under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 multiple copying of literary and text works is not permitted unless permission is obtained from each individual copyright holder.

Alternatively a licence can be taken out with CLA. CLA, a non-profit organisation, was formed in 1982 by the Publishers Licensing Society (PLS) and the Authors' Licensing and Collecting Society (ALCS), and issues licences on behalf of rightsholders permitting the photocopying of extracts from books, journals and periodicals to business, education and government.

A licence from CLA will permit multiple copying from an extensive list of UK publications, and from publications in seventeen other countries where CLA has reciprocal agreements, such as Australia, Canada, France, Germany, and the United States of America. The licence fee is then used to compensate owners of intellectual property for the use of their work and all monies recouped are forwarded directly on to authors and publishers on the basis of sound statistical surveys and transactional usage. Fee distribution approached £17 million for the year April 1997 ÷ March 1998.

The arrival of the digital era has not only rewritten the traditional notions of copyright and extended the parameters, but also will have far reaching effects on the management and accessing of information. Not surprisingly therefore, CLA has made this its biggest priority. In response to demand from its licensees, CLA is currently developing a licence for the digitisation and electrocopying of existing print material. Licensees will be able to scan, store and electronically send extracts from copyright material.

The signing of an inter agency agreement by CLA and the Design and Artists' Copyright Society (DACS) was also an historic event, being a major step towards the possibility of clearing the rights of different owners all through one agency. For the first time, under the agreement, the photocopying of artistic works within textual works will be permitted. Peter Shepherd, CLA's Chief Executive said:  "This is an example of our commitment to providing both new and existing licensees  with what they have been asking for.

We see the addition of artistic works to CLA's licences as completing the circle of rights that can be offered to users."As well as developing new products in response to the needs of its licensees, CLA takes an active international role through its membership of the International Federation of Reproduction Rights Organisations (IFRRO), including lobbying on behalf of rightsholders and users with regards to copyright legislation.

In particular CLA has been monitoring the progress of the European Commission's Draft Directive on Copyright through the European Parliament. As well as providing firmer protection for rightsholders and strengthening the position of knowledge-based industries, the Directive should clarify copyright law across the European Union, and thus make it substantially easier for business to trade intellectual property, particularly as the potential of e commerce is realised. So CLA is in the position of being able to offer a range of licences that both serve the needs of information users, whilst ensuring owners of intellectual property are fairly rewarded.

CLA is confident that AUKML members, as information professionals, will have no hesitation in reminding their colleagues and managers about the implications of copyright compliance. CLA has always preferred voluntary agreements and believes AUKML members will need little persuading of the necessity of taking a licence.  Jonathan Leigh-Hunt PR/Marketing Executive  For further information on the CLA licence, or any other aspect of copyright, please contact Claire Blake, Business Development Executive, The Copyright Licensing Agency Limited, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London  W1P 0LP.  Tel: 0171 631 5513.  Fax: 0171 631 5500.  email:  claire@cla.co.uk   website: http://www.cla.co.uk


How do Internet Mailing Lists and Internet Newsgroups differ?

In December's Deadline, Annabel Colley explained the value of email for finding and communicating with people with expertise that you need.  In this edition she looks at another of the internet's great inventions:  Newsgroups or UseNet to give it its proper name.  Way back in the dawn of time, yes before even the World Wide Web in its current form existed the Internet was used primarily as a communications tool. Academics used it to exchange information and some would argue that this is still in fact it's best use.Newsgroups bring together people with common and sometimes esoteric interests.  

In the early day of the internet they provided a simple means through which those setting up the network could discuss problems and suggest solutions.  The idea spread and there are now thousands of groups on everything from nuclear physics to pet ownership to music for all tastes.  The really great thing about a newsgroups is that you can be reasonably sure that the people reading it are passionately interested in the subject.   You are quite likely to find expert opinion, although I tend to find that you are more likely to find serious research and discussion on mailing lists than in newsgroups.  

Unlike email, which arrives in you mail box, newsgroups are passive:  you read them when you want and participate if you want.   Newsgroups are public discussions that anyone with newsreader software can subscribe to and participate in.. You read what other members have written and can post a reply if you choose. You can jot down an email address from a newsgroup discussion and contact someone privately - I do this for potential Panorama contributors.

If I want to find impassioned opinion, potential programme contributors interviewees, grass roots discussions on a disease or a new drug, I will search newsgroups.  However, if I want to monitor long term, legislation, (the Department of Trade and Industry have a mailing list on the progress of the Competition Bill for example) tap into groups of professionals; scientists, barristers or journalists, I will join a mailing list. I monitored the emergence of antibiotic resistant diseases by subscribing to PROMED - a list run for just that topic by the World Health Organisation.  

I keep up to date on new web sites via the UKOLUG list. A good place to find out what groups exist is www.dejanews.com on the Web. The best advice is to start using email, mailing lists, newsgroups.  See back page for details on how to use the AUKML list.   Use it to experiment!


Membership Secretary Sara Margetts reports on the findings of the post conference survey.  Did you find the overall theme of the conference relevant? Reading through the conference questionnaires was heart warming. It seems that all the hard work paid off. Most of the comments were very positive, with everyone saying that they felt the conference was a great success. Overwhelmingly people thought the conference was relevant…."the best one ever"…."Refreshing change". A few people were concerned that the conference title and programme had not encouraged senior management to pay for staff to attend.

Your views on the speakers:  Margaret Wallis received the highest marks for being both an excellent speaker and of most relevance.  Sue Hill got good positive comments but a number of people felt that, although the presentation was fun and highly polished, it was low on content and went on too long. Virtually everyone's comment about Carol Harris' talk was…"very interesting"….."good", "useful"…."but needed more time!". Poor Phil Bradley - almost everyone who filled in the questionnaire did not attend the Sunday morning session, those who did found it "comprehensive and informative". 

Was the salary survey useful? Almost 100% said they found the salary survey useful. Sue Hill's report back on the survey was also very good but people found the links with surveyors and other professions distracting. A couple of people thought the report back would have been better if it had been done by the person who compiled the survey. There were a number of remarks about making this a regular feature, perhaps repeating it every two or three years. It was suggested that London and regional salaries should be compared separately.

Was the workshop useful?
Views on the workshop centred on the organisation of the groups. Many found the groups disproportionate and some people ended up in the same group as people they worked with. Everyone enjoyed the interaction and particularly listening to the report backs at the end of the session. Only the smallest group did not find the exercise stimulating and fun. A note for further reference, some people lost their conference notes because they did not know the chairs were going to be moved around and would have liked some prior notice. 

Were the hotel facilities satisfactory? Being fun loving types we enjoyed staying at the hotel and particularly liked the hotel bar but once again would have enjoyed a chance to swim (presumably not in the sea!). We didn't like the small beds or for the unlucky few with rooms at the front the noise. Alcohol seems to be essential for us - even in our rooms with the lack of a minibar being keenly felt. I'm sure this has nothing to do with the amount we drink but …"water, water and more water" was also requested by a large number!

Thoughts on the food: Food being the next most important item on our agenda, I approached your comments with interest. The hotel breakfast seems to have been the big success. Otherwise most people felt the food was good or ok apart from the veggies who thought the choice uninspiring. China Garden and Royal Pavilion Food and wine at the both the China Garden and the Royal Pavilion were much enjoyed. The veggies did have a long wait at the China Garden with their food arriving later than the rest.

General Points Some very good points were made under the general criticism section of the questionnaire. "Too many speakers in the morning"……."need to review the Sunday morning session"……"could we have a different time slot for the exhibition, say Sunday morning……"We need to end on a more upbeat note with the Sunday morning session". There were some that thought of starting the conference on the Friday evening and leaving the Sunday for a visit or travelling home. One person found the after dinner speaker irrelevant. Other concerns where the high cost of the conference for small libraries.

General plaudits included "very well organised" "new conference format worked very well"."the layout of the chairs was very effective" and a number of "well done and thanks to the team for all their hard work".

Suggestions for next year include a session on CAR (computer assisted research), electronic picture archiving – tips, guidelines and developments, multi - skilling, law, can we manage without paper? – are electronic press sources sufficient? can libraries make serious money?  

Recommendations for possible venues were Manchester, Jersey, Leicester, Newcastle and Glasgow. Other ideas raised were for the conference to be held somewhere central, that doesn't change every year, so that travel costs can be planned. London also got a couple of votes with visits to main news libraries for example: BBC, News International and the Guardian. The following comment on the speakers, sums up how many of you felt "please can we have speakers of the same quality. The lectures were pitched at the right level neither confusing or insulting the audience



" ELVIS in NEON
AUKML visit to BBC Broadcasting House 12.1.99


Some of our snowbound colleagues up north couldn’t make it but there was still a good turnout for the AUKML visit to BBC Information and Archives at Broadcasting House on January 12th.  The winter chill was soon dispelled by the lashings of wine and refreshments  provided by our hosts led by Jenny Martin,  Research Services Manager at the BH Research Centre.  We were very lucky in having so many people from Information & Archives and the  Dialog Corporation on hand to tell us about their work and give demos.

Everyone was intrigued to see NEON (News Information Online) the new ‘electronic cuttings service’ custom designed by Dialog for the BBC.  The NEON service (in its final development stages) will give desktop access to the full electronic text (rather than images of actual  cuttings) of articles from over 80 UK and international titles by April 1999.  And what titles:  although some of the sources are available to other users via Dialog,  many have been specially requested by the BBC for NEON and therefore they will have exclusive text feeds from publications such as Hello and the Express. 

In some cases, where a direct electronic feed is not possible due to the method of production,  Dialog converts the original document to electronic format using optical character recognition.  Some of these publications are happy for the BBC to have their material but don’t want to give public access via commercial hosts.   In many cases,  also,  the information will be available to NEON users before it is loaded on Dialog’s commercially available services.

Information and Archives decided on this customised route because they wanted to be able to have subject access using the same controlled terms across all their resources. So the NEON thesaurus is closely allied to the headings for the paper cuttings collection.   Articles are automatically subject indexed by firing them against a profile of words and phrases commonly associated with a topic: if enough are present in the article in the right patterns,  then that  article will be retrieved when the topic is requested by the searcher.‘Navigator’ buttons guide the user through the thesaurus of subject headings. So far there are about 17,000 thesaurus terms compared with 10,000 terms used in the manual cuttings system.  

Searching can also be by free text or a combination of search tools e.g. subject headings and free text. Another useful feature is the scope search which will apply generic terms to a search e.g. a subject search on police can then be scoped for ‘comment and criticism’  or ‘accidents’ or ‘youth’.  A navigator button brings up the full list of generic terms available for searching.

NEON will be made available to BBC users via the corporation’s Intranet on a commercial basis using designated passwords.  Obviously a lot of work has gone in to setting up NEON but everyone was staying mum about the cost! There were so many other resources on show it’s hard to do them all justice. ELVIS attracted a lot of attention - the Electronic Visual Image Store gives access to 83 thousand electronic news stills (no doubt a few of them are of the late great Mr P).

Access via theIntranet is free - a charge is made when an image is downloaded - delivery is by ISDN or hardcopy. A traffic light colour coding system alerts the user to the copyright status of the image. Images can be linked thematically so that a search for pictures on Clinton’s impeachment brings up stills of all the people involved.

Also available via the Intranet, the Anniversaries database is added to daily and covers births, deaths, and every other kind of significant event.  Information can be extracted in many different ways: so for example, the system calculates when it will be 5, 10,  25 years after Princess Diana’s death and can list significant milestones in Tony Blair’scareer.  The Forthcoming Events database will soon be combined with the anniversaries giving a very powerful tool for programme makers always on the look out for inspiration.

A tour of the Sound Archives (covering BBC output) and the Gram library bought-in music and sound) revealed some fascinating facts: it’s only since 1984 that BBC news and current affairs radio broadcasts have been comprehensively recorded.  (The BBC radio series of  ‘On this day’ came to swift end as a result!).   The criterion for selection for detailed indexing to enable retrieval by anything other than the bare basics such as programme name and date is:  what might programme makers want to use in the future? 

So the Sound Archives librarians need to be expert in anticipating their users’ demands.  One way they do this is by producing compilation CD’s - for example,  there are 24 CDs covering sound from the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait and the Gulf war starting with the first urgent pleas for help going out on Kuwait radio.  These CDs are for BBC users only as a lot of the material is not BBC copyright (CNN commentaries for instance) and producers are aware of this. 

There is also an ongoing project to convert old vinyl LP recordings of BBC material to CD format.  About 20 vinyl copies were originally made and in many cases, especially for much requested items,  the Archives are down to their last few. Since radio news journalists moved to Television Centre in west London, the Sound Archives have the facility to play recordings over to TC: they are downloaded onto minidisk at the other end.  There is a similar link to Brentford where drama and entertainment recordings are stored. Recordings date back to Florence Nightingale but the most requested tend to be Margaret Thatcher, Kennedy and Churchill. 

Recently, Peter Mandelson’s resignation led to a request for a sound package covering his career  ‘Things can only get better’ sung at the election victory party and so on. All in all,   a very interesting and enjoyable evening was had by all leaving us with plenty to think about not least how making resources available via the Intranet is seeing a growing trend  towards ‘generic’ librarians able to index and retrieve any type of material. And the takeaway info./stationery packs were much appreciated by all!    


TV REVIEW: SHOOTING THE PAST BY STEPHEN POLIAKOFF: BBC2


If you've ever wanted to kill someone you've worked with, those memories maywell have come flooding back to you if you've been watching Stephen Poliakoff's Shooting the Past. For Oswald Bates is the most infuriating librarian you're ever likely to come across although sadly, not the only irritating thing about the programme. Both plot and situation are highly improbable and it is difficult to watch,  particularly as a Librarian, without shouting at least one sneering comment at the television. 

The whole story hinges on Picture Librarian Marilyn Truman who is given one week to find a home for 10 million photographs in order to make way for an American Business School.   Although it is clear that the collection is both unique and valuable, she is unable to find a buyer.  Instead of considering obvious solutions, such as offering it for auction or splitting it up to sell to picture agencies, she resorts to increasingly desperate and devious means.   The supporting characters which make up Marilyn's team of misfits, sorry staff, are irritating not only because each one represents the usual variations on the familiar librarian stereotype but also because it is hard to imagine any of them actually functioning in a work situation. 

Both Nick (Young, Quiet Librarian) and Veronica (Tweedy, Spinster Librarian) suffer from memory loss while the special skills of Spig (Young, Wacky Librarian) consist of stalking around in leather pants pouting and being able to find a picture when you're stoned.   You can only feel sympathy for Christopher Anderson, the American setting up the business school, when he tries in vain to find a useful skill between them which would make them reemployable at the school. Marilyn herself appears cool and competent yet runs the library in a most unbusiness like manner.  None of the staff appear to have proper jobs but hang around drinking tea, smoking and going all dreamy when anyone produces a photograph.  Usually at the same time the music starts. 

There is no sense of urgency or work pressure with everyone clearing off at lunch time for a three course meal, supplied by full catering staff, and they don't receive a customer until half way through the last episode.  This obviously takes them by surprise with Veronica practically dropping the telephone in shock.  Oswald, (Loose Cannon Librarian) seems to have his own special job which involves spending all day `making connections` out of the pictures.  Does he have time to answer the phone, you wonder.   And despite the size of the collection, it is not even online.  Heaven forbid.  

Having said all of this, if not taken too literally, Shooting The Past is compulsive viewing. Although unrealistic, it does serve as an effective metaphor for passing time and changing values.  It is also interesting how the central characters, Marilyn, Oswald and Mr Anderson interact and develop with Mr Anderson being reunited with his past while Marilyn is allowed to progress into the future.  Both Lindsay Duncan as Marilyn Truman and Timothy Spall as Oswald Bates are very impressive in their performances and there is plenty in the script to keep you on the edge of your seat.  On top of this, the many sequences of photographs are fascinating and along with the music, add an extra originality and moving quality to the drama. 
Sue McTeer  Guardian Research@Information Dept

THE THINGS THEY SAID by Father Webb (Bishop of Wapping)


Our grand editor Ian Watson has now returned from his Christmas visit to Russia.
I hope his secret rendezvous with the stripper Eva Vestoff went smoothly. Had to put the old confessional in for a 5,000 mile service and an M.O.T. (Minister of Truth certificate) this month and so I thought it a good idea torummage through the files. 

In 1969 the broadsheet Sun was up for grabs and one of the contenders was Robert Maxwell.   On the 4th June 1969  the Daily Mirror published a letter from Robert Maxwell to the then chairman of The Sun Hugh Cudlipp of his plans.  In paragraph five he said the following "The new company owning The Sun would be a company limited by guarantee whose members would not participate in its profits.  Profits will be used first to provide an adequate pension scheme for the employees and then to establish reserves for continued publication and development."

On the first day of publication of the new tabloid Sun (17th November 1969) they published the following under the headline A Touch on a button and the new Sun is born.  This carried a picture of  smiling Mrs Murdoch doing just that.  The article went on to say the following "So now it's thank you to the trade unions who bent over backwards to get the paper into print"

I now move on to 1971 when the Daily Mirror printed an article on Idi Amin headed The guileful lamb.  The article begins "A thoroughly nice man. That was the diplomatic summing up in London last night after a three-day look at President Idi Amin."

Back now to the 9th April 1958 and the Yorkshire Post carried the following story headlined   BBC backroom boys produce television tape recorder. Picture and sound without loss of original quality.  "Eight of the BBC's backroom boys have produced a giant tape recorder - six feet high and five feet wide with 150 valves.   Hmm. Maybe a bit tricky to fit it under the telly.  However at the foot of the story  the journalist asked whether a smaller edition of the machine (VERA) would ever be available for home use.  Sir Harold Bishop was optimistic and said that it could be a practical proposition in five or ten years.  Not too far out. They were selling them in the US in 1972 and in the UK in 1973.

Remember the Austin Allegro. This was the car in 1973 that was launched on a wave of optimism. The cruel reality was that it virtually killed off the British motor industry. The Daily Mail on the 17th May 1973 carried the headline Heralding the bright new generation that will carry British Leyland's flag.   The article began"Booming British Leyland today launches it's most important new model since the Mini - the Austin Allegro." 

The article went on to describe all it's virtues such as Wax injected body sections.   Hydragas suspension, square steering wheel etc etc. Michael Kemp the writer kindly gives a woman's view at the foot of the story (his wife.)  She said " I like the Allegro.  It's exciting and different."   She was not so sure if the five gears were necessary for lazy motorists, and she liked the square wheel. - Yes well the reinvention of the wheel never did really take off did it. I have been told though that they make excellent window frames. 

The broadsheet Sun on the 22nd February 1965 ran a very worrying story headed Scientists study 7,500 Pictures for clues to moon - crust peril. The article was written by Ronald Bedford. Science Editor. - I remember him well - he was as blind as a bat and had a speech impediment. Schtill I digress. "Scientists examining the photographs sent back by American Ranger 8 spacecraft were last night debating the big question: Is it safe to put a man on the moon? The 7,500 pictures have already convinced some scientists that the answer is No.

They believe the moon may be like a meringue - hard in appearance but soft just below the surface."  (Sounds like someone I know.)  "They fear that the 12 – ton spaceship now being built to land the first Americans on the moon by 1970 might disappear without trace in a mushy layer 60ft deep."  If only.   The famous quote could have been " That's one small step for man, one giant leap forward for mankind - and I've got a boot full of meringue." 

The year is 1964 and the Beatles have played the Royal Variety Performance and taken America by storm.  The News of the World in their gossip column published the following " I hear that Lady Home, ( wife of  P.M. Sir Alec)  who likes to deal with the post in person, was going through the mail at No. 10 Downing Street the other morning when she came upon a letter asking for the Beatles autographs. She returned it marked  'Not known at this address."

And so to the present. All the newspapers have predicted  that Charlton Athletic who gained promotion to the Premier Division will go straight back down. How ridiculous. Even if they have changed their name to Charlton Athletic Nil.